Public participation in the Scottish Parliament: Understanding the core principles of deliberative democracy and creating a framework for measuring impact

Author: Dr Ruth Lightbody, with Andrew Aiton, Laura Black, Ailsa Burn-Murdoch and Alistair Stoddart.

PDF Published: Friday 15 Mar 2024 (SB 24-13)

Image: Figure 2: Proposed core principles for deliberative practice

Image: Figure 3: Roberts et al’s Ladder of community participation

Image: Figure 1: Example of tracing influence of a deliberative process, adapted from Demski and Capstick 2022

Williamson, A., & Barrat, J. (2022). Mapping Deliberative Democracy in Council of Europe Member States. Prepared for the Division of Elections and Participatory Democracy, Department of Democracy and Governance, Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/-mapping-deliberate-democracy/1680a87f84 [accessed 24 February 2024]

Smith, G. (2009). Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elstub, S. (2014). Deliberative Pragmatic Equilibrium Review: A Framework for Comparing Institutional Devices their Enactment of Deliberative Democracy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(3), 386-409.

Lightbody, R. (2023). ‘Advice to inform the Open Government public participation strategy’. A report commissioned by the Scottish Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/advice-inform-scotlands-open-government-public-participation-strategy/documents/ [accessed 24 February 2024]

Boswell, J., Dean, R., & Smith, G. (2023). Integrating citizen deliberation into climate governance: Lessons on robust design from six climate assemblies. Public Administration, 101(1), 182-200.

Demski, C., & Capstick, S. (2022). ‘Impact evaluation framework for climate assemblies’, KNOCA. Retrieved from https://knoca.eu/app/uploads/2022/11/Impact-evaluation-framework-for-climate-assemblies-1.pdf [accessed 24 February 2024]

Elstub, S., Carrick, J., & Khoban , Z. (2021). Democratic Innovation in the Scottish Parliament: An Evaluation of Committee Mini-Publics. Scottish Affairs, 30(4), 493-521.

Deligiaouri, A., & Suiter, J. (2021). A policy impact tool: Measuring the policy impact of public participation in deliberative e-rulemaking. Policy Internet, 13, 349-365.

Bächtiger, A., & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001 [accessed 24 February 2024]

Michels, A., & Binnema, H. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Deliberative Democratic Initiatives at the Local Level: A Framework for Analysis. Administration & Society 2019, 51(5), 749-769. doi: 10.1177/0095399718760588

OECD. (2021). Evaluation Guidelines for Representative Deliberative Processes. Retrieved from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/10ccbfcb-en/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/10ccbfcb-en [accessed 24 February 2024]

Caluwaerts, D., & Reuchamps, M. (2016). Generating democratic legitimacy through deliberative innovations: The role of embeddedness and disruptiveness. Representation, 52, 13-27.

Esaiasson, P., & et al, . (2019). Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance. British Journal of Political Science, 49, 291-314.

De Fine Licht, J., & et al, . (2014). When does transparency generate legitimacy? Experimenting on a context-bound relationship. Governance, 13, 349-365.

Clayton, A., O'Brien, D.Z., & Piscopo, J.M. (2019). All male panels? Representation and democratic legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science , 63(1), 113-29.

Rasmussen, R., & Reher, S. (2022). (Inequality in) Interest Group Involvement and the Legitimacy of Policy-Making. British Journal of Political Science.

Roberts, J.J., Gooding, L., Ford, R., & Dickie, J. (2023). Moving From “Doing to” to “Doing With”: Community Participation in Geoenergy Solutions for Net Zero—The Case of Minewater Geothermal. Earth Sci. Syst. Soc. , 3(10071). doi: 10.3389/esss.2023.10071

Geddes, M. (2019). The effectiveness and influence of the select committee system, House of Commons Liaison Committee. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/advice-inform-scotlands-open-government-public-participation-strategy/documents/ [accessed 24 February 2024]

Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lightbody, R. (2017). Hard to reach’ or ‘easy to ignore’? Promoting equality in community engagement’. Centre for Families and Relationships, What Works Scotland Evidence Bank. Retrieved from http://whatworksscotland.ac.uk/publications/hard-to-reach-or-easy-to-ignore-promoting-equality-in-community-engagement-evidence-review/ [accessed 24 February 2024]

O'Hagan, A. (2017). Gender budgeting in Scotland: A work in progress. Administration, 65(3), 17-39. doi: 10.1515/admin-2017-0022

Sandover, R., Moseley, A., & Devine-Wright, P. (2021). Contrasting Views of Citizens’ Assemblies: Stakeholder Perceptions of Public Deliberation on Climate Change. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 76-86.

Moulds, S. (2019). From Disruption to Deliberation: Improving the Quality and Impact of Community Engagement with Parliamentary Law Making, Paper for Presentation at ASPG Annual Conference Parliaments navigating disruption. Retrieved from https://www.aspg.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/20190915-Moulds-APSG-Paper-.pdf [accessed 24 February 2024]

Warburton, D., Wilson, R., & Rainbow, E. (2007). Making a Difference: A guide to evaluating public participation in central government. Retrieved from https://www.involve.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/docuemnt/Making-a-Difference-.pdf [accessed 24 February 2024]

Curato, N., Chalaye, P., Conway-Lamb, W., De Pryck, K., Elstub, S., Morán, A., … Werner, H. (2023). Global Assembly on the Climate and Ecological Crisis Evaluation Report. Retrieved from https://researchprofiles.canberra.edu.au/en/publications/global-assembly-on-the-climate-and-ecological-crisis-evaluation-r [accessed 24 February 2024]

Steiner, J. (2012). The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy, Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, S., Elstub, S., Johns, R., & Stark, A. (2017). Rating the Debates: The 2010 UK Party Leaders’ Debates and Political Communication in the Deliberative System. British Politics, 12(2), 183-208.

Bächtiger, A., Gerber, M., & Fournier-Tombs, E. (2022). 'Discourse Quality Index. Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy.

Fischer, F., & Boossabong, P. (2018). Deliberative Policy Analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy.

Wagenaar, H. (2022). Deliberative Policy Analysis. Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy.

Chalmers, A., & Aiton, A. (2023). Tracking public engagement through the parliamentary process. Retrieved from https://spice-spotlight.scot/2023/11/27/guest-blog-tracking-public-engagement-through-the-parliamentary-process/ [accessed 24 February 2024]

Fraccaroli, N., Giovannini, A., & Jamet, J.F. (2020). Central banks in parliaments: a text analysis of the parliamentary hearings of the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecb.wp2442~e78be127c0.en.pdf [accessed 24 February 2024]

Gastil, J. (2022). Survey Methods. Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy .

Taplin, J. (2019). Chapter 32: Qualitative approaches to democratic innovations. Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance.

Knobloch, K.R., Gastil, J., Reedy, J., & Cramer Walsh, K. (2013). Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review. Journal of Applied Communication Research. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2012.760746

Last Updated: 28/4 1:43am

Image: Figure 2: Proposed core principles for deliberative practice

Image: Figure 3: Roberts et al’s Ladder of community participation

Image: Figure 1: Example of tracing influence of a deliberative process, adapted from Demski and Capstick 2022

An error occured while loading, please try again in a few minutes.