Addressing the nature crisis: COP15 and the global post-2020 Biodiversity Framework

Author: Ellie Wood

PDF Published: Monday 11 Oct 2021 (SB 21-69)

Image showing genetic diversity, diversity between species, and diversity of ecosystems. Together these three levels of variation are known as 'biodiversity'.

Image: Figure 1: Biodiversity includes genetic diversity within species and variation between species and ecosystems …

Image: Figure 2: Interactions are an important component of biodiverse ecosystems …

Map of Scotland indicating locations of six habitat types: maerl beds in the Fetlar to Haroldswick Marine Protected Area, coastal machair at Loch Druidibeg, South Uist, blanket bog at Carn nan Tri-tighhearnan, Inverness, freshwater environments on the River Tay, temperate rainforests at Taynish National Nature Reserve in Argyll and urban greenspace in Kelvingrove Park, Glasgow.

Image: Figure 3: A snapshot of the variety of life found in Scotland …

Diagram showing how ecosystem services such as nutritious food, opportunities for recreation, climate and flood regulation and fertile soils support human wellbeing. Aspects of human wellbeing include secure access to resources, personal safety, physical fitness, good mental health, enjoyment of nature and healthy foods.

Image: Figure 4: Ecosystem services support human wellbeing …

Graph showing the extinction rate of vertebrates between 1500 and 2014 - with a strong acceleration in extinctions from 1700-1800 to present day. The greatest cumulative extinctions as a percentage of IUCN-evaluated species is experienced by mammals and birds.

Image: Figure 5: The vertebrate species extinction rate has accelerated since the Industrial Revolution and is now up to 100 times higher than it would be without extinctions caused by humans …

A graph showing that average abundance of animal groups has been decreasing between 1970 and 2016. Average abundance of 20,811 populations representing 4,392 species monitored across the globe declined by 68%.

Image: Figure 6: Globally, populations of mammals, birds, fish, amphibians and reptiles reduced in size by an average of 68% between 1970 and 2016 …

Bar chart showing average percentage declines in animal population abundance across different world regions between 1970 and 2016. The greatest declines have been in Latin America and the Caribbean at 94%, followed by Africa at 65%, Asia-Pacific at 45%, North America at 33% and Europe and Central Asia at 24%.

Image: Figure 7: Between 1970 and 2016, animal populations reduced in size in all regions of the world - with the greatest declines in Latin America and the Caribbean …

Scale showing how nations and territories of the world rank for their biodiversity intactness - from 1 (least biodiversity intact) to 240 (most biodiversity intact). The figure shows that the UK ranks the lowest of the G7 countries for biodiversity intactness at 50% biodiversity intactness. Scotland ranks slightly higher than the UK as a whole, with 56% biodiversity intactness.

Image: Figure 8: National and regional biodiversity intactness rankings …

Infographic showing key pressures on nature in Scotland from the State of Nature Scotland 2019 report: agricultural management, climate change, hydrological change, woodland management, pollution, invasive non-native species, urbanisation, upland management, marine climate change, fisheries.

Image: Figure 9: Drivers of biodiversity loss in Scotland …

Policy areas for biodiversity mainstreaming in Scotland: rural policy, fisheries, forestry policy, climate policy, national planning.

Image: Figure 11: Key policy areas influencing Scotland's biodiversity …

Timeline showing key events for the Convention on Biological Diversity since entering into force in 1993 and expectations ahead of its 2050 Vision of Living in Harmony with Nature. Thus far, biodiversity has continued to decline since the CBD came into force.

Image: Figure 10: Timeline of CBD events and targets (so far not achieved) …

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2006). The Convention on Biological Diversity. Article 2. Use of Terms. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/convention/articles/?a=cbd-02 [accessed 28 April 2021]

NatureScot. (2020). What is biodiversity?. Retrieved from https://www.nature.scot/scotlands-biodiversity [accessed 3 May 2021]

Mace, G.M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A.H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(1), 19-26.

Stringer, A.P., & Gaywood, M.J. (2016). The impacts of beavers Castor spp. on biodiversity and the ecological basis for their reintroduction to Scotland, UK. Mammal Review, 46(4), 270-283. doi: 10.1111/mam.12068

Crutzen, P.J. (2006). The “Anthropocene”. In: Ehlers E., Krafft T. (eds) Earth System Science in the Anthropocene. (n.p.): Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin III, F.S., Lambin, E.F., … Foley, J.A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. doi: 10.1038/461472a

Jones, L.P., Turvey, S.T., Massimino, D., & Papworth, S.K. (2020). Investigating the implications of shifting baseline syndrome on conservation. People and Nature, 2, 1131-1144. doi: 10.1002/pan3.10140

Nicholls, C.I., & Altieri, M.A. (2013). Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

Reed, D.H., & Frankham, R. (2003). Correlation between Fitness and Genetic Diversity. Conservation Biology.

Hughes, A.R., Inouye, B.D., Johnson, M.T., Underwood, N., & Vellend, M. (2008). Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters.

Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. London: HM Treasury.

IPBES. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.

Costanza, R., Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I., … Turner, R.K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152-158.

Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P.R., Barnosky, A.D., García, A., Pringle, R.M., & Palmer, T.M. (2015). Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5), 1400253. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400253

IUCN Red List. (2021). Background & History. Retrieved from https://www.iucnredlist.org/about/background-history [accessed 18 May 2021]

Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. London: HM Treasury.

WWF. (2020). Living Planet Report 2020 - Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten M. and Petersen, T. (Eds): WWF, Gland, Switzerland.

FAO. (2021). The impact of disasters and crises on agriculture and food security. Rome: https://doi.org/10.4060/cb3673en.

Clavero, M., & García-Berthou, E. (2005). Invasive species are a leading cause of animal extinctions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(3), 110. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.003

Franco , A.M.A., Hill, J.K., Kitschke, C., Collingham, Y.C., Roy, D.B., Fox, R., … Thomas, C.D. (2006). Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss onextinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Global Change Biology. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01180.x

Gasparatos, A., Doll, C.N.H., Esteban, M., Ahmed, A., & Olang, T.A. (2017). Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030

Bergström, L., Kautsky, L., Malm, T., Rosenberg, R., Wahlberg, M., Åstrand Capetillo, N., … Wilhelmsson, D. (2014). Effects of offshore wind farms on marine wildlife—a generalized impact assessment. Environmental Research Letters. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034012

Legagneux, P., Casajus, N., Cazelles, K., Chevallier, C., Chevrinais, M., Guéry, L., … Gravel, D. (2018). Our House Is Burning: Discrepancy in Climate Change vs. Biodiversity Coverage in the Media as Compared to Scientific Literature. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00175

Arneth, A., Shin, Y.J., Leadley, P., Rondinini, C., Bukvareva, E., Kolb, M., … Saito, O. (2020). Post-2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009584117

Mori, A.S. (2020). Advancing nature-based approaches to address the biodiversity and climate emergency. Ecology Letters. doi: 10.1111/ele.13594

Gardner, C.J., Struebig, M.J., & Davies, Z.G. (2020). Conservation must capitalise on climate’s moment. Nature Communications. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13964-y

Global Resources Initiative. (2020). Global Resource Initiative Final Recommendations Report Executive Summary. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/876465/gri-taskforce-executive-summary.pdf

Walton, P., Eaton, M., Stanbury, A., Hayhow, D., Brand, A., Brooks, S., … Wormald, K. (2019). The State of Nature Scotland 2019. The State of Nature partnership.

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Montréal: 211 pages.

Convention on Biological Diversity. (2006). History of the Convention. [accessed 25 May 2021]

Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2010). Global Biodiversity Outlook 3.. Montréal: 94 pages.

RSPB. (2019). A lost decade for nature: How the UK has missed its targets for nature; Why we must act now to revive our world. Available at: http://ww2.rspb.org.uk/Images/A%20LOST%20DECADE%20FOR%20NATURE_tcm9-481563.pdf.

Williams, B.A., Watson, J.E.M., Butchart, S.H.M., Ward, M., Brooks, T.M., Butt, N., … Simmonds, J.S. (2020). A robust goal is needed for species in the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Conservation Letters, 12778. doi: 10.1111/conl.12778

Duarte, C.M., Agusti, S., Barbie , E., Britten, G.L., Castilla, J.C., Gattuso, J.P., … Worm, B. (2020). Rebuilding marine life. Nature, 580, 39-51. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2146-7

UN Environment Programme. (2021). FIRST DRAFT OF THE POST-2020 GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/abb5/591f/2e46096d3f0330b08ce87a45/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf

Green, E.J., Buchanan, G.M., Butchart, S.H.M., Chandler, G.M., Burgess, N.D., Hill, S.L.L., … Gregory, R.D. (2019). Relating characteristics of global biodiversity targets to reported progress. Conservation Biology, 33(6), 1360-1369. doi: doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13322

Watson, J.E.M., Keith, D.A., Strassburg, B.B.N., Venter, O., Williams, B., & Nicholson, E. (2020). Comment: Set a global target for ecosystems. Nature, 578, 360-362.

Xu, H., Cao, Y., Yu, D., Cao, M., He, Y., Gill, M., … Pereira, H.M. (2021). Ensuring effective implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity targets. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(1767), 411-418.

Pisupati, B. (2016). Role of Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEAs) in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a special focus on biodiversity-related multilateral environmental agreements. United Nations Environment Programme: Division for Environmental Law and Conventions.

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?. Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1-14.

UK Parliament Environmental Audit Committee. (2021, June 30). Toothless Government policy and targets insufficient to stem the tide of UK biodiversity loss. Retrieved from https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/62/environmental-audit-committee/news/156218/toothless-government-policy-and-targets-insufficient-to-stem-the-tide-of-uk-biodiversity-loss/ [accessed 5 October 2021]

Scottish Government. (2020, June 19). Continuity Bill: Equality Impact Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/continuity-bill-equality-impact-assessment/ [accessed 5 October 2021]

JNCC. (2019). Sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Peterborough: JNCC.

Last Updated: 3/5 12:56pm